Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Cook

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 20, 2017No. COA16-883Published

1DissentStroud, Judge

Because I believe that the majority failed to rely on the dispositive law in this case, North Carolina General Statute § 14-51.2, I dissent.

While the State may characterize defendant's testimony in a slightly different way, when considering whether to provide the self-defense instruction to the jury the trial court was required to view defendant's evidence as true. See State v. Whetstone , 212 N.C. App. 551, 554-55, 711 S.E.2d 778, 781-82 (2011) ("Our Supreme Court has held when there is evidence from which it may be inferred that a defendant acted in self-defense, he is entitled to have this…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. ReidSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
  2. State v. LyonsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1995
  3. State v. PearsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  4. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1996
  5. State v. WhetstoneCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API