Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Stowell

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 30, 1989No. 3-88-0726PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Heiple

The plaintiffs, Mark and Linda Anderson, brought suit against the defendants, Willard Stowell, Jackie Stowell, and Carol Doyle. Count II of the plaintiffs’ amended complaint alleged that the Stowells had violated the Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act (the Act) (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1987, ch. 1211/2, par. 261 et seq.). The trial court subsequently granted summary judgment in favor of the Stowells on count II of the plaintiffs’ amended complaint. The plaintiffs bring this interlocutory appeal, arguing that the court erred in granting summary judgment.

The relevant underlying facts…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Zimmerman v. Northfield Real Estate, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1987
  2. Maurice Transport Co. v. Amoco Oil Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1986

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Kleczek v. JorgensenAppellate Court of Illinois · 2002
  2. Scarsdale Builders, Inc. v. Ryland Group, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1996
  3. Pack v. MaslikiewiczAppellate Court of Illinois · 2019
  4. Carrera v. SmithAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999
  5. Strauss v. CruzAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API