Carrera v. Smith
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rapp
Plaintiffs, Melesio Carrera and Maryellen Carrera, appeal the trial court’s dismissal of count III of their amended complaint. Count III set out a claim against defendants Richard G. Smith and Adelaide E. Smith (the Smiths); none of the other defendants is a party to this appeal. Plaintiffs argue that the Smiths, who allegedly committed fraud during the sale of their home to plaintiffs, are subject to liability under the Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act (815 ILCS 505/1 et seq. (West 1998)). We affirm.
Plaintiffs’ amended complaint alleged as follows. The Smiths assisted…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Epstein v. Chicago Board of EducationIllinois Supreme Court · 1997
- Zimmerman v. Northfield Real Estate, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1987
- Gunthorp v. GolanIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
- People v. DrakefordIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
- Rochon v. RodriguezAppellate Court of Illinois · 1997
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Provenzale v. ForisterAppellate Court of Illinois · 2001
- Kleczek v. JorgensenAppellate Court of Illinois · 2002
- Pack v. MaslikiewiczAppellate Court of Illinois · 2019
- NDC LLC v. TopinkaAppellate Court of Illinois · 2007
- Grady v. SikorskiAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.