City of Colorado Springs v. Climax Molybdenum Co.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
EBEL, Circuit Judge.
In this water law litigation, Climax Molybdenum Company (“Climax”) appeals the district court’s denial of its motion to intervene in a set of consolidated cases over which the district court retained jurisdiction after first deciding them more than fifty years ago. The appeal presents an issue of first impression in this circuit: whether a proposed intervenor may establish standing, and thus federal court jurisdiction over its motion to intervene, by “piggybacking” on the standing of an existing party to a lawsuit over which the district court has retained jurisdiction but…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Arizonans for Official English v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- FW/PBS, Inc. v. City of DallasSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Diamond v. CharlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- City of Herriman v. BellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- Brazell v. PHH Mortgage Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
- Kane County, Utah v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
- Planned Parenthood of Kan. v. AndersenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018
- United States v. RamosCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.