Walter Robinson v. the Estate of Walter Jester
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
McFADDEN, Judge.
These appeals arise from trial court orders granting defense motions for summary judgment.* 1 Because the trial court erred in finding that the lawsuits are barred by the statute of limitation, we reverse.
Summary judgment is appropriate when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. In reviewing the grant or denial of a motion for summary judgment, we apply a de novo standard of review, and we view the evidence, and all reasonable conclusions and inferences drawn from it, in the light most favorable to the nonmovant.
MA…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Block v. Voyager Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1983
- Franklyn Gesner Fine Paintings, Inc. v. KetchamSupreme Court of Georgia · 1984
- Anderson v. BruceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
- McCarley v. McCarleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
- Woods v. Belvedere Park ApartmentsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Callaway v. Quinn.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2018
- Eddie Jerome Streeter v. City of AlbanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2018
- Martha Jackson v. Georgia Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2019
- PHILLIPS v. PHILLIPS Et Al.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2016