Legal Opinion

United States v. Salemme

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided June 28, 1997No. Cr. 94-10287, 97-10009PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER UNSEALING DECISION June 28, 1997

WOLF, District Judge.

The previously redacted and sealed portions of the May 22, 1997 Memorandum and Order provided to the parties are now being unsealed because Angelo “Sonny” Mercurio has testified, and the government has acknowledged, that he was an informant for the government in connection with the October 29, 1989 electronic surveillance of 34 Guild Street, Medford, Massachusetts.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the previously sealed and redacted portions of the attached May 22, 1997 Memorandum and Order (in footnotes 3 and 9) are UNSEALED.

MEMOR…

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. United States v. SalemmeDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1999
  2. United States v. ConnollyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
  3. United States v. ConnollyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007
  4. United States v. FlemmiDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2001
  5. United States v. SalemmeDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1998

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API