Legal Opinion

State v. Henley

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 4, 1977No. 20588, CA 8336PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

The thrust of defendant’s assignment of error in this case is incompetent performance by his trial counsel. As we noted in State v. Robinson, 25 Or App 675, 550 P2d 758 (1976), this issue, except in rare instances, is one which can be properly resolved only in a post-conviction proceeding in which evidence can be taken. This is not one of those instances.

Affirmed.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. CardwellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  2. State v. ChaseCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  3. State v. BatemanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  4. State v. ChaseCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  5. State v. HowardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API