Legal Opinion
State v. Robinson
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided June 14, 1976No. 75-1044, CA 5195PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Per curiam
Defendant, having been convicted of murder upon trial by jury, contends on appeal that his trial counsel was incompetent. This issue, except in rare instances, is one which can be properly resolved only in a post-conviction proceeding in which evidence can be taken. See, Turner v. Cupp, 1 Or App 596, 465 P2d 249 (1970). This is not one of those rare instances.
Affirmed.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Turner v. CuppCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970
3Cited by21 opinions
- Matthew Sexton v. Mike CoznerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- State v. HenleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
- State v. ChaseCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
- State v. BatemanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
- State v. ChaseCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.