Legal Opinion

Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad v. Cross

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided January 13, 1931No. 40612PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWagner, J.

The plaintiff, Railroad Company, in its petition, seeks to enjoin the use, by defendant, of an opening under a trestle bridge on the railroad right of way as an under-crossing, or as a means of ingress and egress to and from her premises. It is the plaintiff Company’s intention to replace the trestle bridge with permanent construction and to install reenforced concrete pipes adequate for necessary drainage. The purpose of the-replacement of the bridge is to promote safety, eliminate fire hazard and reduce the cost of maintenance.

The defendant, in her answer, alleges in substance, that she and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Schrimper v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1900
  2. Culver v. ConverseSupreme Court of Iowa · 1929
  3. Teachout v. DuffusSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
  4. LaPlant v. SchumanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1923
  5. Cassens v. MeyerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1912

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Peters v. Burlington Northern RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1992
  2. Webb v. ArterburnSupreme Court of Iowa · 1954
  3. Paul v. MeadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1943
  4. Phillips v. GriffinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1959
  5. Mary Ann Slycord v. Audrey J. Garrett and Bobby Dean Martin, Astrustee of Mmm TrustCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API