Legal Opinion

STATE BY McLEAN v. Lanza

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided March 6, 1959PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

60 N.J. Super. 130 (1959)

158 A.2d 351

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, BY JOSEPH E. McLEAN, COMMISSIONER OF CONSERVATION AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

v.

SILVIO A. LANZA, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued February 24, 1959.

Decided March 6, 1959.

Before Judges GOLDMANN, CONFORD and HANEMAN.

Mr. Vito F. Lanza, appellant, argued the cause pro se.

Mr. Philip Lindeman, II, argued the cause for plaintiff-respondent (Mr. David D. Furman, Attorney General, and Mr. Bernard Hellring, Special Counsel, attorneys).

No appearance by defendant-appellant…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. State v. LanzaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
  3. Grove v. GroveNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
  4. Sheahan v. UPPER GREENWOOD LAKE, ETC., ASS'NNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
  5. City of Clifton v. Cresthaven Cemetery Ass'nNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Grober v. KahnNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1965
  2. State v. LanzaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962
  3. Huny & Bh Associates Inc v. Avi SilberbergNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API