Legal Opinion

Edwards v. Warnell

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided August 9, 1933No. 9215PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAtkinson, J.

1. “In tlie absence of fraud or collusion, a married woman may borrow money (the husband’s creditor not being the lender) to furnish to her husband, in order that he may pay his debts, notwithstanding the lender or purchaser knows of such purpose.” Jackson v. Reeves, 156 Ga. 802 (4) (120 S. E. 541) ; Rood v. Wright, 124 Ga. 849 (53 S. E. 390) ; Braswell v. Federal Land Bank of Columbia, 165 Ga. 123 (3) (139 S. E. 861); Saxon v. Rational City Bank, of Rome, 169 Ga. 784 (2) (151 S. E. 501).

2. In the instant case a married woman instituted an action to enjoin collection of the amount of a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Jackson v. ReevesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1923
  2. Braswell v. Federal Land BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1927
  3. Saxon v. National City BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1930
  4. Rood v. WeightSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Purdue v. BarberSupreme Court of Georgia · 1937
  2. Domestic Loans of Washington, Inc. v. WilderCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
  3. Magid v. BeaverCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937
  4. United States v. FrostDistrict Court, M.D. Georgia · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API