Legal Opinion

Baker v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided May 16, 1933No. 4 Div. 899PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

SAMFORD, Judge.

There was evidence tending to prove that this defendant and a negro were together at a whisky still on a branch in Barbour county; that it was on land belonging to some one else; that he and defendant were alone at the still; that the still was in operation and whisky running; that defendant was seen to place a jar under the spout in which the whisky was running; that upon being approached by the officers the defendant fled. This was sufficient evidence upon which to base a verdict of guilt.

The above holding is not in conflict with the holding in Dickey v. State, 22 Ala. App.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Elmore v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1926
  2. Elmore v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
  3. Dickey v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1928
  4. Hill v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1928

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Baker v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API