Taylor v. Tomlinson
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Appeal from Clay Circuit Court, Western District. Francis Johnson, Special Judge. STATEMENT BY THE COURT. On the 30th of October, 1894, appellant obtained judgment in a justice’s court against appellee in the sum of $105.65, on which an execution issued November 16, 1895, and was returned as levied on certain personal property of appellee November 26, 1895. Appellee filed with said court a schedule of his personal property, including the property levied on, claiming same as…
Read the full summary
Appeal from Clay Circuit Court, Western District. Francis Johnson, Special Judge. STATEMENT BY THE COURT. On the 30th of October, 1894, appellant obtained judgment in a justice’s court against appellee in the sum of $105.65, on which an execution issued November 16, 1895, and was returned as levied on certain personal property of appellee November 26, 1895. Appellee filed with said court a schedule of his personal property, including the property levied on, claiming same as exempt, and asked for a supersedeas. The justice disallowed his claim, and refused the supersedeas, and from the…
1Opinion of the Court
Wood, J.,
(after stating the facts.) 1. The judgment of the circuit court is correct. The judgment of the justice on the first application for supersedeas is as follows: “Comes the defendant, C. A. Tomlinson, and files before me a schedule in exemption, as required by law; also the original notice of said schedule to the plaintiff; and, it appearing to the court, from the return of the sheriff thereon, that said notice was served by delivering a copy thereof to the oldest member of the family of said plaintiff at home, and it appearing to the court that the oldest member at home, and to whom…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Thomas v. PalmerNevada Supreme Court · 1926
- Launius v. DrakeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1917