Legal Opinion
Vetrano v. Miller Place Union Free Sch. Dist.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided February 22, 2019No. 2:16-cv-03329 (ADS)(AYS)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SPATT, District Judge:
The plaintiff Kyle Vetrano (the "Plaintiff") brought this action under the Civil Rights Act of 1871, 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (" Section 1983") against the defendants Miller Place Free School District (the "District"), Miller Place High School (the "High School"), Christine Mangiamele ("Mangiamele"), and Marianne Higuera ("Higuera") (collectively, the "Defendants") alleging violations of his constitutional rights to free speech, freedom of association, and due process.
Presently before the Court is a motion by the Defendants, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure ("FED. R.…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Hazelwood School District v. KuhlmeierSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Bethel School District No. 403 v. FraserSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Adrian I. Stone, pro se and as legal guardian on behalf of C.S., a minor v. Lloyd L. “Joe” Peck, et al.District Court, N.D. New York · 2025
- Kristoffersson v. Port Jefferson Union Free School DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2023
- Potrzeba v. Sherburne-Earlville High SchoolDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2023