Legal Opinion

Clark v. Deutsch

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided April 29, 1885No. 11,885PublishedCited by 4 opinions

From the Pulaski Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.

The appellee presents two questions of practice which require attention before considering the other questions in the case.

The first question is settled against him by the cases of Trentman v. Eldridge, 98 Ind. 525, and Western Union Tel. Co. v. Trissal, 98 Ind. 566. These cases decide that where there is a special finding in the record, and the record shows that it was made upon request of one of the parties, the court will presume that the request was properly and seasonably made, unless the record affirmatively shows the contrary.

The special finding in this case is preceded by what appears…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Trentman v. EldridgeIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Elliott v. FrakesIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Armstrong v. CavittIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Hendrix v. McBethIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Nutter v. HawkinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1884

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hutchinson v. LemckeIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Hartlep v. ColeIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Bumb v. GardIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Blixt v. JanowiakWisconsin Supreme Court · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API