Legal Opinion

Woodtick v. Crosby

Montana Supreme Court

Decided January 9, 1976No. 12981PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Daly

This is an appeal from the district court, Big Horn County, from a final judgment dismissing plaintiff’s complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

Plaintiff, a competent Crow Indian, was issued a patent in fee simple on October 13, 1971 to land situate within the exterior boundaries of the Crow Indian Reservation. Subsequently, by warranty deed dated October 29, 1971, plaintiff conveyed this land to Rodney L. Crosby, a non-Indian.

By his complaint, filed July 23, 1974, plaintiff seeks cancellation of the deed given Crosby alleging that by this deed Crosby became the non-Indian owner of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Bear v. District Court of the Fifteenth Judicial District Ex Rel. County of RooseveltMontana Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Larkin v. PaughSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  3. Dickson v. Luck Land Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
  4. Montana Power Co. v. RochesterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1942
  5. Dillon v. Antler Land CompanyDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1972

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Boller v. Key Bank of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 1992
  2. National Farmers Union Insurance Companies v. Crow Tribe of IndiansDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1983
  3. Atkinson v. BeveridgeFort Peck Appellate Court · 2000
  4. Boller v. Key Bank of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API