Legal Opinion

Dolbeer v. Stout

The Superior Court of New York City

Decided January 11, 1892Published

Appeal from an order denying motion to vacate an attachment.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court.—Gildersleeve, J.

This is an appeal from an order denying defendant’s motion to vacate an attachment. The plaintiff, by whom the ■attachment was obtained against the defendant, is the assignee of the cause of action. The affidavit upon which the attachment was issued was made by him; and in it he swears that the sum claimed is due “ over and above all counter-claims known to bim.” The defendant claims that the affidavit was insufficient for the reason that as the plaintiff is .only the assignee of the cause of action, he should have added the words “ or to his assignors,” and that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Steuben County Bank v. . AlbergerNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
  2. Crowns v. VailNew York Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Ruppert v. . HaugNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  4. Mallary v. AllenCity of New York Municipal Court · 1884

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API