Legal Opinion

Evans v. State Ex Rel. Sanford

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 30, 1926No. 7 Div. 652PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.

Action in the nature of quo warranto, brought in the name of the state against respondent (appellant here) for the purpose of excluding him from the exercise of the profession of treating or offering to treat diseases of human beings. Section 9932, subd. 1, Code 1923.

-Such a proceeding may be instituted on the information of some individual, but security for costs must be given. Section 9933, Code of 1923. In such a case the statute contemplates that the security should be given before the commencement of the suit, is a condition precedent to the right under the statute of instituting the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Speed v. CockeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1876
  2. Ex parte BradshawSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  3. Naro v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  4. Taylor v. State ex rel. HandSupreme Court of Alabama · 1858
  5. Little v. State ex rel. HueySupreme Court of Alabama · 1902

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Ex Parte TalleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
  2. Owen v. State Ex Rel. BailesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
  3. Brannan v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  4. State ex rel. Radcliff v. LautenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1952
  5. Hillhouse v. HillhouseSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API