Legal Opinion

McGlauflin v. RCC Atlantic Inc.

District Court, D. Maine

Decided May 3, 2010No. CV-09-467-B-WPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ RULE 12(f) MOTION TO STRIKE

JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR., Chief Judge.

The Court denies the Defendants’ Rule 12(f) motion to strike the investigative report and disposition of the Plaintiffs Maine Human Rights Commission complaint because it concludes that the Maine Human Rights Act requires the Plaintiff to plead the disposition of the administrative action, that the Defendants themselves affirmatively raised questions about the scope of the administrative investigation and findings, and that there is no likely prejudice from the exhibits to the jury, since the local practice is…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. King v. Georgia Power CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1968
  2. Walton v. Nalco Chemical Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
  3. Moss v. Lane Co.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 1970
  4. Berke v. Presstek, Inc.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1998
  5. Morell v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1999

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Essex Insurance v. FoleyDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 2011
  2. BEER v. TOYOTA MOTOR CORPORATIONDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2024
  3. HALL v. PRESIDENT AND TRUSTEES OF BATES COLLEGEDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2022
  4. HEWITT v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONERDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2020
  5. MCKAY v. FAY SERVICING LLCDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2024

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API