Norwood v. State
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
STRINE, Chief Justice:
I. INTRODUCTION
This appeal arises from the robbery of a Family Dollar store in Dover on September 4, 2012 by three men. The identities of two of the perpetrators were not the subject of dispute between the State and the defendant, Cameron Norwood, who the State charged with being the third man. But Norwood claims that he is innocent because he was not the third man. Nor-wood sought to create a reasonable doubt about his guilt by arguing that another man, Khalil Dixon, had been the third man who robbed the Family Dollar store on September 4, 2012. In support of that…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Huddleston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- United States v. Richard StevensCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- Getz v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1988
- United States v. Yagih AboumoussallemCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- United States v. Robin Rochelle LucasCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Rybicki v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2015
- Hansley v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2014
- Appiah v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2020
- Burrell v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2024
- Commonwealth v. Yale, E., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.