Legal Opinion
Pollenex Corp. v. Sunbeam-Home Comfort
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided September 15, 1993No. 92 C 0098PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BRIAN BARNETT DUFF, District Judge.
This case comes before the court on the Plaintiffs assertion that the Defendants infringed U.S. Patent No. 5,020,517 (the “ ’517 patent”). On July 20-22, 1993, this court conducted a bench trial on the issue of whether the ’517 patent is unenforceable because of the patent applicant’s alleged inequitable conduct before the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. This court has heard the evidence and considered the credibility of the witnesses, the testimony, exhibits, memoranda of law, arguments of counsel, and each party’s proposed findings of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Kingsdown Medical Consultants, Ltd. And E.R. Squibb & Sons, Inc. v. Hollister IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Fmc Corporation v. The Manitowoc Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Labounty Manufacturing, Inc. v. United States International Trade Commission, Dudley Shearing MacHine Manufacturing Co., Ltd., Intervenor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
- Halliburton Company v. Schlumberger Technology CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- Merck & Co., Inc. v. Danbury Pharmacal, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Monon Corp. v. Stoughton Trailers, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1996
- Pollenex Corp. v. Sunbeam-Home ComfortDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1993