Legal Opinion
Baron Philippe De Rothschild v. Paramount Distillers, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 1, 1996No. 87 Civ. 6820 (SHS)PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STEIN, District Judge.
Defendants Mar-Inter S.A.R.L., Roger L. Myers and Chantal Myers (the “Myers defendants”) move to dismiss plaintiffs’ amended complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction and improper venue, to transfer this action to the Southern District of Florida or, alternatively, for summary judgment. For the reasons that follow, the Myers defendants’ motion is denied.
I. BACKGROUND
Plaintiffs Baron Phillippe de Rothschild S.A., Societe Civile Chateau Lafite Rothschild, Guy de Rothschild, Erie de Rothschild and PMUippine de Rothschild brought this action in 1987 against…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Marine Midland Bank, N.A. v. James W. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
- Bruce Ball v. Metallurgie Hoboken-Overpelt, S.A.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- Kreutter v. McFadden Oil Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1988
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Chloé v. Queen Bee of Beverly Hills, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
- Bensusan Restaurant Corp. v. KingDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- Elsevier, Inc. v. GrossmanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Malletier v. Apex Creative International Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Toy Biz, Inc. v. Centuri Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1998
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.