Legal Opinion
Diebold v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided June 4, 1951No. 21589PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
241 S.W.2d 31 (1951)
DIEBOLD
v.
GREAT ATLANTIC & PACIFIC TEA CO.
No. 21589.
Kansas City Court of Appeals. Missouri.
June 4, 1951.
Fred Bellemere and Fred Bellemere, Jr., Kansas City, for appellant.
Otto Schmid, Kansas City, for respondent.
BROADDUS, Presiding Judge.
This is an action for Workmen's Compensation. On April 28, 1949, employee, John B. Diebold, filed with the Division of Workmen's Compensation a claim against his employer, the Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company. In this claim Diebold alleged that while working in employer's store at 3736 Broadway, Kansas City, Missouri, he sustained an…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Wood v. Wagner Electric CorporationSupreme Court of Missouri · 1946
- In Re Claim of Dependents of Seabaugh v. Garver Lumber Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1947
- Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1951
- Douglas v. St. Joseph Lead Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1950
3Cited by12 opinions
- Davis v. Research Medical CenterMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
- Merriman v. Ben Gutman Truck Service, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1965
- Brown v. Griesedieck Western Brewing Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1952
- Long v. Mississippi Lime Co. of Mo.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1953
- Barron v. Mississippi Lime Company of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 1955
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.