Legal Opinion

City of Willoughby Hills v. Cincinnati Insurance Co.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 10, 1986No. 10-276PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDonofrio, J.

This case commenced in the court of common pleas as a declaratory judgment action, filed by plaintiff-appellee, city of Willoughby Hills, based on defendant-appellant’s, Cincinnati Insurance Company’s, failure to defend appellee in two lawsuits, referred to as Kondrat and Macko, as required under the terms of an insurance policy purchased by appellee in 1977. After the trial court and the court of appeals found that appellant was not under any duty to defend these actions, the matter was certified to the Ohio Supreme Court. The Supreme Court reversed, holding that appellant was required to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. City of Willoughby Hills v. Cincinnati InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Motorists Mutual Insurance v. TrainorOhio Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Shaker Savings Assn. v. Greenwood Village, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. McKinney v. White Sewing Machine Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1964
  5. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. PildnerOhio Supreme Court · 1974

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. The Lincoln Electric Company, Plaintiff-Appellee v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company, Defendant-Appellant/ Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
  2. Sherwin-Williams Co. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's LondonDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1993
  3. Blount v. KennardOhio Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. Irondale Industrial Contractors, Inc. v. Virginia Surety Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2010
  5. American Employers Insurance v. Metro Regional Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1992

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API