Legal Opinion

Mead v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided December 1, 1993No. Docket 147868PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiffs appeal from an order of the circuit court granting summary disposition in favor of defendant on plaintiffs’ claim under an uiiderinsured motorist coverage clause in an automobile insurance policy issued by defendant. We affirm.

Plaintiff Lorrie Mead was injured when she was involved in an accident with a drunk driver. Plaintiffs brought suit against the driver and the bar that had served the driver. Mediation of the matter resulted in an evaluation of $450,000 against the driver and $50,000 against the bar. The suit was subsequently settled in the amount of $65,000, $20,000 being…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Parker v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. Schroeder v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Erickson v. Citizens InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. Zbegner v. Allied Property & Casualty InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
  3. Berkeypile v. Westfield InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API