Calvin Brooks Zeigler v. State of Alabama
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
DYER, Senior Circuit Judge:
Zeigler appeals the denial of his petition for writ of habeas corpus. He asserts that the Supreme Court of Alabama’s decision in Ex parte McCurley, 390 So.2d 25 (Ala. 1980) invalidated his 1979 conviction for the possession of the controlled substance Tal-win (pentazocine) by determining that Tal-win was not a controlled substance in 1973, prior to his arrest. The Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals denied his writ of error coram nobis and determined that, notwithstanding the McCurley decision, Talwin became a controlled substance in 1974. Zeig-ler v. State, 412 So.2d…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Calder v. BullSupreme Court of the United States · 1798
- Standefer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Emich Motors Corp. v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Ex Parte McCurleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1980
- Griggs v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1954
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. BaileyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
- Zeigler v. StateCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984