Legal Opinion

Griggs v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided May 18, 1954No. 4 Div. 251PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARWOOD, Judge.

The indictment against the appellants, omitting the formal parts, charge that they “set up, or were concerned in setting up or carrying on, a lottery,” etc.

The appellants filed respectively a motion to quash, and a demurrer to the indictment, each of which were overruled. Substantially the same grounds were assigned in support of the demurrer as were assigned to the motion to quash.

The indictment follows the form prescribed in our code for such offenses, Section 259, Title 15, No. 71, Code of Alabama 1940, and was not subject to quashing, or to demurrer. Reynolds v. State, 29…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Calder v. BullSupreme Court of the United States · 1798
  2. Tot v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Hopt v. People of Territory of UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  4. Hawes v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1889
  5. People v. McBrideIllinois Supreme Court · 1908

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Marchetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Lidge v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1982
  3. Salter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1985
  4. State v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
  5. Pickett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1983

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API