Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Yeager v. Lake Cty. Court of Common Pleas

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 22, 2024No. 2023-1172PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 176 Ohio St.3d 595.] THE STATE EX REL . YEAGER, APPELLANT, v. LAKE COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS ET AL., APPELLEES. [Cite as State ex rel. Yeager v. Lake Cty. Court of Common Pleas,

2024-Ohio-1921.] Mandamus—Prohibition—Appellant had adequate remedy in ordinary course of law through direct appeal to raise his claim that trial court violated his right to counsel—Trial court did not patently and unambiguously lack jurisdiction—Court of appeals’ judgment granting trial court’s motion to dismiss affirmed. (No. 2023-1172—Submitted March…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Robinson v. WessonOhio Supreme Court · 2025
  2. State ex rel. Schwarzmer v. MazzoneOhio Supreme Court · 2025
  3. Patituce v. WernerOhio Court of Appeals · 2025
  4. State ex rel. Hill v. LaRoseOhio Supreme Court · 2026
  5. State ex rel. Hoffman v. Akron Mun. CourtOhio Court of Appeals · 2025

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API