Legal Opinion

Patituce v. Werner

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 22, 2025No. 2025CA0026-MPublished

1Opinion of the Court

[Cite as Patituce v. Werner,

2025-Ohio-5700.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF MEDINA ) JOSEPH PATITUCE Relator C.A. No. 2025CA0026-M v. JUDGE GARY WERNER ORIGINAL ACTION IN PROHIBITION Respondent Dated: December 22, 2025 PER CURIAM. {¶1} Relator, Joseph Patituce, has petitioned this Court for a writ of prohibition against Respondent, Judge Werner. Judge Werner has moved to dismiss the petition. Mr. Patituce did not respond in opposition. For the following reasons, we grant the motion to dismiss. {¶2} When this Court reviews a motion to dismiss…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Seikbert v. WilkinsonOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State ex rel. Dannaher v. CrawfordOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State ex rel. Ames v. Summit Cty. Court of Common Pleas (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
  4. State ex rel. Richard v. WellsOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  5. State ex rel. Reynolds v. KirbyOhio Supreme Court · 2023

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API