Legal Opinion
Brink v. DaLesio
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided May 21, 1979No. Civ. No. Y-78-161PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOSEPH H. YOUNG, District Judge.
The plaintiff, Donald E. Brink, a member of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local 311 and Joint Council 62, has initiated this action against Leo DaLesio and Alfred Bell, an officer of the locals, charging numerous violations of fiduciary obligations allegedly owed to the union and its members. Local 311 and Joint Council are also named as defendants. Plaintiff Brink has brought this action under the Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act, 29 U.S.C. § 501(b), and the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, 29 U.S.C. § 1132. The complaint was…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. Procter & Gamble Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Andresen v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Rogers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- In Re San Juan Star Company, Pedro Juan Soto v. Carlos Romero Barcelo, in Re Pedro Juan Soto, Pedro Juan Soto v. Carlos Romero Barcelo, Miguel Hernandez Agosto, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981
- Brink v. DaLesioCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1981
- Koster v. Chase Manhattan BankDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1982
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. James R. Gould, Doing Business as Brokers for Agricultural CooperativeassociationsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. Dresser Industries, Inc., United States, Intervenor. Securities and Exchange Commission v. Dresser Industries, Inc., Edward R. Luter, United States, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.