Rom v. Huber
Supreme Court of New Jersey
On,appeal from the Essex Common Pleas.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Black, J.
The defendant in this case was sued to recover damages for personal injuries. The trial resulted in. a verdict for the defendant. The essential and undisputed evidence in the case is, that the plaintiff, Martin Rom, on the night of February 21st, 1918, went to a Turkish bath' establishment conducted by the defendant, Frank Hub.er, in the city of Newark, for the purpose of taking a bath. After spending some time in the office and paying the required fee, he went to the place provided for undressing and from there to the hot room and later on to…
2Cited by11 opinions
- Johnson v. Wagner Provision Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1943
- De Baca v. KahnNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1945
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. LoganCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
- Nordgren v. StrongSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
- Hiatt v. . RitterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.