Legal Opinion

Armstrong v. American Bank & Trust Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 13, 1933No. 12654PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CONNER, Chief Justice.

Thig appeal is from an instructed verdict and judgment in favor of appellee bank in the sum of $20,499, with interest thereon at the legal rate from the date of the judgment.

The facts out of which the litigation grew are in briefest form as follows:

On January 2, 1923, George W. Armstrong was insolvent, and had pending an application in the proper bankruptcy court to be discharged from the payment of his debts. He was'possessed of a large amount of property, and was largely indebted. Among other debts listed by him in the proceedings was an indebtedness aggregating…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Zavelo v. ReevesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Camp v. Dallas Nat. Bank of DallasTexas Commission of Appeals · 1931
  3. Parvin v. ByersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
  4. Armstrong v. Continental Nat. BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. James v. HadaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  2. First National Bank of Santa Anna v. BrownTexas Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Flex v. Houston Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API