Legal Opinion

Tide-Water Co. v. Coster

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided November 15, 1866PublishedCited by 8 opinions

The opinion of the Chancellor is reported ante p. 55.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

The Chief Justice.

The appellant, the Tide-water Company, is a corporation created by an act of the legislature, passed April fourth, 1866. The purpose for which this company was called into existence, was to assist in draining the tide-water marshes adjoining Newark bay and its tributary streams. The means by which this useful end was to be attained were, in the statutory language : “ The construction, maintenance, and management, of suitable dykes, drains, ditches, dams, sluices, engines, pumps, and all other machinery, works, and structures,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Beekman v. Saratoga & Schenectady Rail RoadNew York Court of Chancery · 1831
  2. Nichols v. City of BridgeportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1854
  3. Canal Bank v. Mayor of AlbanyNew York Supreme Court · 1832
  4. In re the Mayor of New-YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1830

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Bung's Bar & Grille, Inc. v. TP. COUNCIL OF FLORENCENew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1985
  2. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc. v. GlaserNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978
  3. St. John the Baptist, C., Church v. GengorNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1935
  4. Lenzner v. City of TrentonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
  5. Serkin v. Ocean Tp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API