Legal Opinion
Battey v. Paris Beauty Parlors Supply Co. of San Francisco, Ltd.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided August 30, 1933No. 2974PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SAMES, District Judge.
The patentee, Sumter B. Battey, and his assignee, Duart Manufacturing Company, Limited, instituted this suit against the defendant for infringement of patent No. 1,681,511 for a hair waving or curling device applied for November 4,1926, issued August 21, 1928. The claims of the patent alleged to be infringed by defendant’s apparatus are as follows:
“1. A hair waving or curling device comprising a frame, a rotatable form supported thereby, said frame being adapted to wind up and tension a strand of hair, means for locking the form against rotation relative to the frame,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Imhaeuser v. BuerkSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Johns-Manville Corporation v. National Tank Seal Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1931
- N. O. Nelson Mfg. Co. v. F. E. Myers & Bro. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1928
- Beyer Co. v. Fleischmann Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1926
- Naivette, Inc. v. BishingerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1932
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Minneapolis-Honeywell Regulator Co. v. Thermoco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941
- Minneapolis-Honeywell Regulator Co. v. Thermoco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941