Legal Opinion

Carter v. Chambliss

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 12, 1960No. 38081PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Nichols, Judge.

1. Special ground numbered 4 of the amended motion for new trial complains that the excerpt from the charge quoted as “A” was in irreconcilable conflict with the excerpt quoted “B,” and special ground 6 complains that the excerpt quoted as “A” was error because it failed to include the requirement of the quoted ordinance that the plaintiff’s deceased husband have his vehicle under “instant control.”

It is obvious that the excerpts were intended to be mere converse statements of the same rule, and while the excerpt quoted *496as “A” does not refer to the “instant control” requirement…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Adler v. AdlerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950
  2. Canal Insurance Co. v. Winge Bros., Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1958
  3. Knox v. KnoxSupreme Court of Georgia · 1957
  4. Halpern v. StricklandCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ward v. BengeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API