Legal Opinion

Casey v. Brennan

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided July 16, 2002PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

Based on the Court’s grant of a cross-petition for certification filed by plaintiffs Kathryn Caesy and Sheila Gagliano, 170 N.J. 389 (2001), the sole issue before us is whether appellants can be considered statutory dissenters pursuant to N.J.S.A. 14A:11-1 in connection with their efforts to secure an award of counsel and expert fees.1 In respect of that issue, the judgment of the Appellate Division is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Steinberg. 344 N.J.Super. 83, 780 A.2d 553 (2001).

The Court contemporaneously denied a petition for certification filed…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Casey v. BrennanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2001

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Welch v. via Christi Health Partners, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2006
  2. State v. P.L.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2004
  3. DeNike v. CupoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2007
  4. ALBEE v. ALBEEDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2024
  5. Casey v. BrennanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2002

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API