Legal Opinion

Casey v. Brennan

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided July 16, 2002Published

1Opinion of the Court

801 A.2d 245 (2002)

173 N.J. 177

Kathryn CASEY and Sheila Gagliano, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

and

Carol de Sanctis, John Everitt and Thomas Morrissey, individually and as representative of the subclass of non-recovering shareholders, and Stuart L. Pachman, as interim representative of the subclass of recovering shareholders, Plaintiffs-Respondents,

v.

George G. BRENNAN, Joseph J. DiSepio, Patricia M. Keys, Frank T. Kurzawa, George E. Scharpf and Harold G. Smith, Defendants,

and

Amboy Bancorporation, a New Jersey corporation and New Amboy, INC., a New Jersey corporation, Defendants-Respondents,

and

Jonathan…

Also in this document: Per curiam; Dissent.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Jersey City Chapter of Property Owner's Protective Ass'n v. City Council of Jersey CitySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1969
  2. Aponte-Correa v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2000
  3. Casey v. BrennanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2001
  4. Casey v. BrennanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API