Legal Opinion

Wuerpel v. Sinnott

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided November 3, 1920No. 22375PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from Civil District Court, Parish of Orleans; Porter Parker, Judge. Action by A. C. Wuerpel and others against Charles J. Sinnott, wherein Lyle Saxon and others were garnished. Judgment for plaintiff was rendered against the garnishees, and they appeal!

1Opinion of the Court

Statement of the Case.

MONROE, C. J.

On December 3, 1913, plaintiffs, as trustees of the bankrupt Smith Bros. Company, Limited, brought suit against the defendant, Charles J. Sinnott, for $55,-616.05, with interest; and on December 9 following defendant, through his attorneys, Lyle Saxon, E. N. Pugh, and Charleé J. Theard, answered, admitting the debt, whereupon, on- motion of plaintiffs, through counsel, judgment was rendered upon.the petition and answer as prayed for.

Thereafter execution was issued, and Lyle Saxon, Armand Romain, and Charles J. Theard were garnished, and on February 17, 1914,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. David v. RodeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1883
  2. Carter Bros. v. Galloway & BurnsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1884
  3. Florance v. YorkeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1847
  4. Slatter v. TiernanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1857

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Cagle Supply of Lafayette, Inc. v. HinsonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API