Legal Opinion

Foster v. Snyder

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 16, 1999No. E023610PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

*266Opinion

GAUT, J.—

1. Introduction

The Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) appeals the Riverside County Superior Court’s judgment granting a petition for writ of administrative mandate in favor of plaintiff, David L. Foster, Jr. The judgment prohibited the DMV from suspending the driver’s license of plaintiff, who was under the age of 21 with a blood-alcohol concentration (BAC) in excess of 0.01 percent when he drove an automobile. On appeal, the DMV first contends the trial court erroneously found the defense of duress applicable to an administrative per se1 proceeding. Second, the DMV contends…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Gikas v. ZolinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Lake v. ReedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Pollack v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Lentz v. McMahonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  5. McDonnell v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Foster v. SnyderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API