Foster v. Snyder
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
*266Opinion
GAUT, J.—
1. Introduction
The Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) appeals the Riverside County Superior Court’s judgment granting a petition for writ of administrative mandate in favor of plaintiff, David L. Foster, Jr. The judgment prohibited the DMV from suspending the driver’s license of plaintiff, who was under the age of 21 with a blood-alcohol concentration (BAC) in excess of 0.01 percent when he drove an automobile. On appeal, the DMV first contends the trial court erroneously found the defense of duress applicable to an administrative per se1 proceeding. Second, the DMV contends…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Gikas v. ZolinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Lake v. ReedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- Pollack v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Lentz v. McMahonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- McDonnell v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Foster v. SnyderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999