Smedberg v. Simons
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
GORDON, Justice:
This is an appeal from a judgment for defendants-appellees and from a denial of plaintiff-appellant’s motion for a new trial in an action to recover damages for personal injuries. We take jurisdiction pursuant to Rule 19(e), 17A A.R.S. Rules of Civil Appellate Procedure, and affirm.
It is appellant’s position that the trial court erred in its instructions to the jury on the law of open and obvious conditions and erred in refusing to give appellant’s requested instructions relative to open and obvious conditions. The facts necessary to a resolution of the matter, viewed in the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Dawson v. Payless for DrugsOregon Supreme Court · 1967
- Cummings v. PraterArizona Supreme Court · 1963
- Kauffman v. SchroederArizona Supreme Court · 1977
- Flowers v. K-Mart Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1980
- Murphy v. El Dorado Bowl, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Nicoletti v. Westcor, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1982
- Beach v. City of PhoenixCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
- Bellezzo v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
- Bellezzo v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
- Perez v. Circle KCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2024
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.