Bellezzo v. State
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Concurrence
CLABORNE, Presiding Judge,
specially concurring.
I agree with the majority’s conclusion that the danger posed to the Bellezzos was not unreasonable. I also agree with the majority’s conclusion concerning the legal duty that Arizona owed to Mrs. Bellezzo. Clearly, a landowner owes a duty to one he invites on his premises, and that duty is to use reasonable care to keep those premises safe for the use of the person invited. Tribe v. Shell Oil Co., 133 Ariz. 517, 519, 652 P.2d 1040, 1042 (1982). Yet, I also agree with the position of others that to divide guests into invitees, licensees, or…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Orme School v. ReevesArizona Supreme Court · 1990
- Akins v. Glens Falls City School DistrictNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- Pokora v. Wabash Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Coburn v. City of TucsonArizona Supreme Court · 1984
- Byrns v. Riddell, IncorporatedArizona Supreme Court · 1976
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.