Legal Opinion
Rockwood v. City of Burlington, VT.
District Court, D. Vermont
Decided September 21, 1998No. 2:98-cv-00223PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SESSIONS, District Judge.
In this action for declaratory and injunc-tive relief, Plaintiffs William G. Roekwood and David M. Roekwood (“the Rockwoods”) seek to enjoin enforcement of the city of Burlington, Vermont’s (“City’s”) recently enacted “Youth Access to Tobacco Ordinance,” (“Ordinance”) which regulates the advertising of tobacco products. Pursuant to Rule 65(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the hearing on Plaintiffs’ motion for temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction was consolidated with a trial on the merits. The ease was tried to the…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Gibbons v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- People ex rel. Lockyer v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.California Supreme Court · 2005
- Nicopure Labs, LLC v. Food and Drug AdministrationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Federation of Advertising Industry Representatives, Inc. v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
- Lorillard Tobacco Co. v. ReillyDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2000
- Federation Of Advertising Industry Representatives, Inc. v. City Of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.