Legal Opinion

United States v. Douglas Sharp

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 29, 1989No. 88-5186PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Per curiam

The government’s appeal from the sentence imposed on Douglas Sharp requires us to determine whether a district court may justify a sentence below the minimum established by the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1986 by relying upon mitigating circumstances sufficient to justify a sentence below the minimum established by the United States Sentencing Guidelines. We hold that it may not, and therefore vacate Sharp’s sentence and remand for resentenc-ing.

I

Sharp was convicted by a jury of one count of conspiracy and one count of possession with intent to distribute 4,985 grams of cocaine, in violation of 21…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Mistretta v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. United States v. Maria Velarde AnguianoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  3. United States v. Lawrence J. KidderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  4. United States v. Leo KleinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  5. United States v. Malcolm C. DonleyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. United States v. Alberto De La FuenteCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  2. United States v. HeckardCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
  3. United States v. Hector GonzalezCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
  4. United States v. Larry Wayne Lafleur, United States of America v. Nick Michael HolmCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  5. United States v. CastanedaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API