United States v. Douglas Sharp
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Per curiam
The government’s appeal from the sentence imposed on Douglas Sharp requires us to determine whether a district court may justify a sentence below the minimum established by the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1986 by relying upon mitigating circumstances sufficient to justify a sentence below the minimum established by the United States Sentencing Guidelines. We hold that it may not, and therefore vacate Sharp’s sentence and remand for resentenc-ing.
I
Sharp was convicted by a jury of one count of conspiracy and one count of possession with intent to distribute 4,985 grams of cocaine, in violation of 21…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Mistretta v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. Maria Velarde AnguianoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Lawrence J. KidderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Leo KleinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- United States v. Malcolm C. DonleyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- United States v. Alberto De La FuenteCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. HeckardCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Hector GonzalezCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Larry Wayne Lafleur, United States of America v. Nick Michael HolmCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. CastanedaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.