Legal Opinion · Dissent

Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland v. Goldman & Rio

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided February 4, 2002Published

1DissentMcCooe, J.

I respectfully dissent. The plaintiff issued an appeal bond to the defendants which obligated them to reimburse the plaintiff for any payment made under the bond up to $28,500 plus interest and costs. The plaintiff made a payment and seeks reimbursement from the defendants. The majority has affirmed the finding that the defendants are personally liable but hold that there is an issue of fact as to whether a letter sent by the defendants to the plaintiff prior to the issuance of the bond modified the language of the bond as to interest and costs so as to deny indemnification for interest and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Braten v. Bankers Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Nassau Chapter, Civil Service Employees Association, Inc. v. County of NassauAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
  3. NASSAU CHAPTER, CIVIL SERV. EMPLOYEES ASS'N, INC. v. County of NassauNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. Berghold v. KirschenbaumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  5. Tri-Messine Construction Co. v. Telesector Resources Group, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API