Legal Opinion

Berghold v. Kirschenbaum

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 29, 2001PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—In an action, inter alia, for a judgment declaring that the plaintiffs are in compliance with the terms of a lease, the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from stated portions of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Martin, J.), dated May 5, 2000, which, among other things, granted that branch of the cross motion of the defendant 815-829 Franklin Avenue, LLC, which was for summary judgment on its counterclaim for a judgment declaring that the plaintiffs failed to properly exercise their option for a second renewal of the lease.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mallad Construction Corp. v. County Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
  2. Rentways, Inc. v. O'Neill Milk & Cream Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1955
  3. BWA Corp. v. Alltrans Express U.S.A., Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  4. Sorrentino v. MierzwaNew York Court of Appeals · 1969

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Moulton Paving, LLC v. Town of PoughkeepsieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  2. ADCO Electrical Corp. v. HRH Construction, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  3. Kaplan v. RobertsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  4. Pepe v. StockAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  5. 315 West 48th Street Realty Corp. v. Maria's Mont Blanc Restaurant Corp.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2015

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API