Legal Opinion
Buergofol GmbH v. Omega Liner Company, Inc.
District Court, D. South Dakota
Decided August 14, 2025No. 4:22-cv-04112Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA SOUTHERN DIVISION BUERGOFOL GMBH, 4:22-CV-04112-KES Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING BUERGOFOL’S vs. MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF ORDER DENYING MOTION TO COMPEL OMEGA LINER COMPANY, INC., Defendant. Plaintiff, Buergofol, requests reconsideration of the court’s order denying Buergofol’s motion to compel (Docket 684) pursuant to Rule 54(b). Docket 708. Defendant, Omega, opposes the motion. Docket 727. Omega also moves the court to award Omega its attorney’s fees and costs for having to respond to Buergofol’s motion. Id. at 29-30. The court issues…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Singh v. George Washington UniversityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
- Lori Anderson v. K-V Pharmaceutical CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015
- SPV-LS, LLC v. The Estate of Nancy BergmanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2019
- Jones v. Casey's General StoresDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 2008
- Planned Parenthood Minnesota v. DaugaardDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2013