Legal Opinion
Planned Parenthood Minnesota v. Daugaard
District Court, D. South Dakota
Decided February 28, 2013No. Civ. 11-4071-KESPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
KAREN E. SCHREIER, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, Planned Parenthood Minnesota, North Dakota, South Dakota, and Dr. Carol E. Ball, move for an award of attorneys’ fees claiming that they have “prevailing party” status following success on a motion for a preliminary injunction and subsequent conduct by the South Dakota Legislature. Docket 95. Defendants, Governor Dennis Daugaard, Attorney General Marty Jackley, Secretary Doneen Hollingsworth, and Board President Robert Ferrell, in their official capacities, argue that such motion is improper and untimely or that…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Buckhannon Board & Care Home, Inc. v. West Virginia Dept. of Health and Human ResourcesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Sherman v. Winco Fireworks, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
- Floyd L. Roberson v. Hayti Police Department Paul Sheckell, Lt. Chris RiggsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
- Sole v. WynerSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Donald R. Ferguson v. United States v. Richard Musal, Third Party Nicholas P. Miller, Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Spirit Lake Tribe v. Alvin JaegerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2021
- Buergofol GmbH v. Omega Liner Company, Inc.District Court, D. South Dakota · 2025
- Burke v. Lippert Components, IncDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2022
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. M.G. Oil CompanyDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2018
- HomeAway.com, Inc. v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2021
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.