Monsky v. Moraghan

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

DORSEY, District Judge.

In an earlier suit (“Monsky I ”) plaintiff alleged that, by virtue of his dog’s conduct in the Danbury Superior Courthouse, defendant violated her rights by infringing her constitutional right of access to the courts.1 That case was dismissed, Monsky v. Moraghan, 947 F.Supp. 53 (D.Conn.1996), Motion to Amend den., 950 F.Supp. 476 (Goettel, J.), aff'd, 127 F.3d 243 (2d Cir.), cert. den., — U.S. -, 119 S.Ct. 66, 142 L.Ed.2d 52 (1998). The complaint was found not to have alleged infringement of that right.

While Monsky I…