Legal Opinion

Martin v. City of Greenville

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided December 1, 1911PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Muhlenberg Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Chiep Justice Hobson

Affirming.

E. W. Martin instituted this proceeding against the city of Greenville tb test the validity of an ordinance of the city prohibiting stock from running at large therein. This court in the case of Tutt v. City of Greenville, 142 Ky., 536, had before it the validity of the ordinance. Its validity on its face was there sustained. But it was not attacked in that case on the ground on which it is attacked here. The question is made here that the ordinance has not been adopted by the City Council. A facsimile of the page of the record book of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Tutt v. City of GreenvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Harrison v. City of GreenvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
  2. Town of Kevil v. HawthorneCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924
  3. City of Richmond v. GoodloeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API