Legal Opinion

Crosby v. Hatch

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided May 10, 1912PublishedCited by 9 opinions

'Appeal from Linn District Court. — Hon. Milo P. Smith, J udge. In an action by plaintiffs against Alice Royder and, Lester O. Hatch to recover attorney’s fees and to enforce an attorney’s lien in connection with a suit originally instituted by Alice Royder against said Hatch for damages for breach of promise of marriage, in which suit plaintiffs were the attorneys for Alice Royder, with a contract for a contingent fee of one-half “of the net recovery had or received,”…

Read the full summary

'Appeal from Linn District Court. — Hon. Milo P. Smith, J udge. In an action by plaintiffs against Alice Royder and, Lester O. Hatch to recover attorney’s fees and to enforce an attorney’s lien in connection with a suit originally instituted by Alice Royder against said Hatch for damages for breach of promise of marriage, in which suit plaintiffs were the attorneys for Alice Royder, with a contract for a contingent fee of one-half “of the net recovery had or received,” either by settlement or otherwise, it appeared that a settlement had been made between Alice Royder and defendant, Hatch, in…

1Opinion of the Court

McClain, C., J.

It is conceded that under the' contract between plaintiffs and Alice Royder, plaintiffs became entitled to receive from her as attorney’s fees one-half the amount recovered by her in her action against this defendant, or received by her under any settlement of the suit which she should make; and that a settlement was made, by which defendant paid $1,500 in settlement of the suit. It is also conceded that in said action, brought by Alice Royder against this defendant, plaintiffs, as attorneys, gave proper notice of a claim for attorney’s fees on any judgment which should be…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hubbard v. EllithorpeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
  2. Gibson v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1904
  3. Smith v. C., R. I. & P. R. Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1881
  4. Kauffman v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1912
  5. Cheshire v. Des Moines City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1911

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Bulk Oil Transports, Inc. v. Robins Dry Dock & Repair Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1921
  2. Todd v. Superior Court of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Lawler v. DunnSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
  4. Harvey v. RoweSupreme Court of Florida · 1940
  5. Tri City Equipment Co. v. Modern Real Estate Investments, Ltd.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API